New York Times columnist Frank Bruni recently challenged the media and Democratic Party for their apparent reluctance to address controversies surrounding President Biden, including his age and son Hunter's business dealings.
In his Times newsletter, Bruni argued that avoiding these topics is "dishonest and dangerous." He pointed out that even mildly critical remarks about President Biden can trigger backlash from liberal circles, with accusations of aiding "MAGA adversaries."
Bruni contended that this protective stance, while intended to shield the president, is ultimately unhealthy. He questioned the rationale of prioritizing the perceived threat of Donald Trump and the Republican Party over addressing legitimate concerns about the Biden administration. He emphasized the disproportionate focus on Trump's moral failings compared to Biden's "blind spots and missteps."
The columnist suggested this approach implies a distrust in the American public's ability to process complex political realities and differentiate between minor flaws and serious misconduct. He also characterized it as elitist, with journalists and Democrats deciding what information the public should be allowed to access.
While acknowledging Biden's overall positive performance as president, Bruni stressed the importance of open discussions about both the strengths and weaknesses of his administration. He specifically highlighted the need to address Hunter Biden's situation, acknowledging the excessive focus of some House Republicans while cautioning against ignoring the issue entirely.
Bruni concluded by urging journalists to prioritize fairness and accountability, arguing that shielding any political figure undermines journalistic credibility and reinforces cynicism. He warned that such actions could ultimately empower figures like Trump.
