A federal judge has directed the Trump administration to release previously frozen federal funds, escalating a legal battle between the administration and several states. The ruling comes in response to allegations that the administration failed to comply with an earlier court order to unfreeze the funds, which had been withheld for programs like the Climate Pollution Reduction Grant and other EPA initiatives. Judge John McConnell, who issued the initial restraining order on January 31st, reiterated his demand for the administration to restore access to funds allocated under the Infrastructure Improvement and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, as well as funding for institutions such as the National Institutes of Health.
The White House maintains that its actions are legal and that challenges to the funding freeze are attempts to undermine the public's will. A spokesperson for the administration emphasized the lawfulness of their actions. The Office of Management and Budget had initially announced a temporary pause on federal grants and loans in a memo dated January 27th, which was later rescinded. However, the White House press secretary clarified that rescinding the memo did not signify an end to the funding freeze.
The administration argues that its actions are aimed at preventing fraud. Judge McConnell, however, countered that the current freezes resulted from a broad order rather than specific instances of suspected fraud, characterizing the freeze as likely unconstitutional and harmful. He emphasized the need for the administration to immediately restore the frozen funds pending a final decision on the preliminary injunction request. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha applauded the judge’s decision, affirming their stance and emphasizing the importance of adhering to the law. He pledged continued vigilance and a willingness to return to court if necessary.
